1

(0 replies, posted in Mac OS X)

I posted a fix on my forum for the bluetooth issues that have been occuring with some MacPros. I figure the more people with this problem that read it, the better.

thelocale.org wrote:

As many other MacPro users have discovered... it seems that the bluetooth reception range was less than a foot away from the computer... the mouse was skippy, and the keyboard would repeat characters often. It has recently been found that some of the Airport and Bluetooth antanae (and an unknown, unlabeled, unconnected wire) were mislabled (and in my case, only 1/2 were labeled) and thuse mis-attached after the bluetooth/airport option was added by Apple.

After much googling, I didn't find a decent tutorial or info on how to fix it, merely short posts on Apple's forums: "Swap 1 with 3 and yada yada. Your done." Also, to boot, only cable#3 and the BT cable were labeled (and possibly mislabled). So I figured it out after much research.  I am also a visual learner and struggle with verbal or written instructions. I had to sketch it out. Here is the diagram I ended up making, and the steps needed to fix. If you own a MacPro and have horrible bluetooth reception, I suggest you look into this. Although look out, if something goes wrong, it may ruin your warranty.

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1855&g2_serialNumber=1

So, in summary:

There are going to be four wires. For me, there were two unlabeled. One was short and disconnected (wouldn't reach the BT module), and the other was longer and attached to the upper airport port.  Another was labeled 3 and attached to the lower airport port, and another was labeled (mislabeled) BT and attached to the BT module.

1. Detach upper airport wire (long, unlabeled)
2. Plug in previously detached short unlabeled wire into the upper airport port.
3. Unplug wire labeled BT from the bluetooth module. Put plastic shroud on it. This wire will be unused.
4. Take longer unlabeled wire that used to be plugged into upper airport plug, and plug it into the bluetooth module.
5. Enjoy.

I have noticed that my bluetooth mighty mouse and apple keyboard work just as good as a wired keyboard and mouse, and my airport extreme reception has actually improved. smile All is good!

2

(5 replies, posted in System Administration)

Strange. I can't say that I know much about running IRC servers, but I have always wanted to smile

3

(16 replies, posted in Watercooler)

Happy New Year? Yeah... I'm a wee bit late. smile

4

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

kuno wrote:

Now if only we had some like OS X's expose...that would be optimal.

Beryl and compiz can both do the same stuff that expose can do. big_smile

5

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

WIntellect wrote:

As I've said before on these pretty graphics - they look fantastic and work beautifully; but give me a day of non-stop work with them and they'll start to irritate me. I want to get work done, not spend half the day watching windows beam/flame up.

MHO

That's what's nice about beryl compared to compiz. With beryl, you can disable everything but dropshadows, or everything but the spinning cube... or just everything if you want so that you desktop is just rendered by your GPU and not your CPU.  You can choose exactly what effects you want, when you want them to happen (there are like 10 diff. effects for opening or closing a window, ranging from simply fading in, or the exploding fire and smoke), all via a really nicely made GUI manager. Also,  the beryl manager runs in the system tray next to the volume control (it's the little gem looking thing) so that you can switch back to metacity (or whatever) in one click. It is also very easy to get to the theme manager and the settings manager via the system tray thinger. Beryl is also setup so that if it crashes it automatically reloads metacity. big_smile

onlinebacon: In gnome w/ metacity w/ one terminal open running top, I am using 124mb of ram.  When I initialize beryl, it goes upto 160mb of ram... so really, considering what it does it barely uses any system memory.  I assume most of its work is stored in the GPU's memory.

6

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

The latest one in the freebsd ports: 1.0.9631_1

A lot of people said that you have to run the unstable beta version of nvidia's driver or else beryl wouldn't work or would be slow....(1.0.9742)... but it was really unstable and kinda sucks... so i went back to the freebsd ports version and everything works like a charm (and is definitely not slow) big_smile

7

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

So for the geeky people, I just got AIGLX, Xorg 7.2, and Beryl working on my FreeBSD 6.1 system. big_smile

It is absolutely fantastic, it looks amazing, is pretty stable, and totally beats anything vista will have or mac has currently.

Enjoy the purty pictures! All pictures have real-time shading/glowing/transparency. aka... I can put a transparent window over a movie and it renders the movie behind it. My whole desktop is rendered in 3d with this and it is amazing... and actually runs faster than 2d because my CPU doesn't really do anything now.... all the desktop rendering is diverted to my Geforce 5900.

Alt-tab produces this: http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1677&g2_serialNumber=2

Changing Desktops moves them around on a cube, which can be controlled 100% like the user (not just a 3d animation like os X. It is fully rendered here. big_smile ) I can move wherever I want rotating around the cube.... oh yeah.. see that WRC rally video that I dragged between the two desktops? It is seemlessly playing while I am chilling between the two desktops!!

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1680&g2_serialNumber=2

Of course there is Expose (mac osx) like stuff where pressing a button shows all my windows equally along the screen. They are still being rendered in full real time (note: the WRC rally video is still playing! seamlessly!) Upong selecting a window brings it in focus and to the front. All widows wobble upon returning big_smile

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1683&g2_serialNumber=2

When a window requires your attention, it creates water ripples and vibrates. AKA, someone messenging me on GAIM, or a terminal window requiring my input!

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1686&g2_serialNumber=2

Moving windows around makes them wobble, shake stretch and skew... again, notice how that while I am doing all of this the video is still perfectly playing at 30fps.

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1689&g2_serialNumber=2


Although, I do have a rather beastly machine... I installed this on a Dell laptop Pentium M 1.6 w/ radeon 9000 mobility w/ 32mb of ram. Everything runs perfectly smooth! Note: We installed vista rc2 on that laptop and even without the special vista effects (vista wouldn't let us run the special effects on it claiming it was "too slow") vista was unbearably slow the hardrive was constatly churning and just sitting on the desktop CPU usage was around 50%.  Under Ubuntu and all this eyecandy, CPU usage is around 4%.  While frantically spinning the cube trying to crash Beryl, cpu usage never went about 75% and everything still ran very smoothly. Perhaps the programmers in redmond should take some advice from programmers who can do better in their free time tongue

These screen shots just don't do this justice. Everything is so pretty, opening windows Zoom in, closing windows Zoom out, minimizing windows makes them spin around and down into the taskbar, bringing them up creates a "Beaming UP" effect. All of which is customizable. I could set it so that when I exit a program it burns up in flames and smoke very  cool big_smile

Anywho... opensource wins big_smile

Edit: Here are the flaming windows and beaming up...

A terminal "burning up"

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1692&g2_serialNumber=2

My firefox window being "beamed up"

http://www.thelocale.org/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1695&g2_serialNumber=2

That looks so... contradictory... I am used to VNC screens which are the exact opposite... Netbsd viewing XP in a window. Strange....

9

(29 replies, posted in Off-Topic)

rectangular@gmail.com

10

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

Works for me like that too...weird.

11

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

Pictures aren't showing up karpet.

12

(19 replies, posted in Off-Topic)

That is good to hear.  I was afraid when I heard that IBM was no longer going to be doing their own laptops, mainly because the IBM t41 I had was probably the best laptop I ever owned.

13

(19 replies, posted in Off-Topic)

That is a pretty sweet laptop! I dunno if you have owned an IBM before, but i had a t41 before it became owned by lenovo. Do you think their quality has gone down? up? or stayed the same since the change over to lenovo?

14

(10 replies, posted in NetBSD)

Personally... I prefer doors.

15

(3 replies, posted in News)

i wonder what the rpm dependencies are for a P-8A...

Photoshop
Illustrator
Dreamweaver

But... that will never happen... soo...

drivers
flash
and uh... poop.

17

(9 replies, posted in Off-Topic)

I really want to see some pictures here! Heh.

What BSD do you plan on putting on it?

Sweet! I really want to get into AJAX it is some snazzy stuff. 

Do you have any book recomendations for RAILS or AJAX?

I am doing the finish touchs on a CMS for a client.  It was definitely a fair share of work, and I can see where you are coming from about the community differences with PHP.  But, because there is a set exact way of doing stuff in Rails... does it take more time to memorize the order of code?

Also, the code is kept all server-side as in PHP correct?

20

(12 replies, posted in General BSD)

Well, if you want to use flash... there is not 64-bit version.  The main difference between 32-bit and 64-bit OS's:

It allows one program access to more than 4gig's of ram.

If you have no need for that, then I believe IMHO that there is not need for the 64-bit version...

This is what I have been told, I do not have a link of info to prove it, but if someone has knowledge to back this up, or disprove it... then please do so.

21

(35 replies, posted in General BSD)

Beagle support would be neat to have...

Like asemi said, better binary support would be nice. Better web development environment.... although I haven't spent much time with the F|OSS options...

For the most part I am pretty happy with my freebsd system. I would write down native java... but... big_smile

22

(497 replies, posted in General BSD)

Or is it fvwm?

Jage, I have been doing some research on Ruby On Rails for alittle while. Seems pretty interesting. I do a lot of PHP, MySQL stuff.

What made you decide to use Ruby on rails? How does it perform? Do you have any links to sites you have made with it?

I have already invested so much time into PHP and MySQL i dunno if I want to bother learning something else.

That is really neat to know. My 12inch powerbook is fantastic. I think I am going to wait until the macbook pros come with the next version of X (hopefully next summer) before I buy one.

What kind of work do you mostly do on it?  Any of the graphics glitches that seem to be plauging some of the macbooks?

Any annoyances that you have found with it?

What do you think about MacOS X? I like using it on my laptop since it is really reliable, but sometimes I get itchy to use my main rig with FreeBSD on it so that I can fiddle...

I agree with parts and bits of what everyone is saying...

I think ecbsd is kind of a strange thing since users who don't have much of a drive (or even know about netbsd) to learn netbsd will be using it. So it could lead to bad hype about the OS. ("Oh it was soo horribly made." "Oh it crashed all the time.") When really what they meant was the ecBSD code. But really, comparing ecBSD to NetBSD is almost, but not quite the same as MacOS X to FreeBSD.  MacOS X is a pretty "aqua" interface over the FreeBSD userland, but did they ruin FreeBSD? No. If anything, it gave advanced OS X users a stepping stone to another OS if they wanted something more to fiddle with than OS X. EcBSD could do the same thing....

It could be good or bad for netbsd, but, I doubt that the real users of NetBSD will be affected at all by it. If someone is turned off by netbsd due to ecbsd I doubt they really would have used netbsd anyways without ecbsd.